You are so stupid that you do not even know you are stupid. I already said from the beginning that I was talking about older slower cpus. AGAIN, you mental midget, AMD can beat Nvidia at lower resolutions and/or with slower cpus because of Nvidia’s poor hardware scheduler. The older and slower the cpu the bigger gap AMD can put on Nvidia.

And FFS the very article you are looking at has the 7900xtx beating the 4090 in cpu intensive scenes even with a 9900k which is not exactly super old or super slow. AMD is NOT being anywhere near as held back as nvidia is because its scheduler is much better in those scenarios. Even with a good cpu there are games where the 7900xtx matches the 4090 at lower resolutions the more cpu bound it gets.

I could go on and give more examples but that pea size brain of yours does not comprehend anything you do not want to hear. Anyway knock yourself out with the last word as I am sure it will be just as asinine as everything else you have said.

You are so stupid that you do not even know you are stupid. I already said from the beginning that I was talking about older slower cpus. AGAIN, you mental midget, AMD can beat Nvidia at lower resolutions and/or with slower cpus because of Nvidia’s poor hardware scheduler. The older and slower the cpu the bigger gap AMD can put on Nvidia.

And FFS the very article you are looking at has the 7900xtx beating the 4090 in cpu intensive scenes even with a 9900k which is not exactly super old or super slow. AMD is NOT being anywhere near as held back as nvidia is because its scheduler is much better in those scenarios. Even with a good cpu there are games where the 7900xtx matches the 4090 at lower resolutions the more cpu bound it gets.

I could go on and give more examples but that pea size brain of yours does not comprehend anything you do not want to hear. Anyway knock yourself out with the last word as I am sure it will be just as asinine as everything else you have said.

Not the sharpest tool in the shed are we? Market share indicates the established value of these GPUs because Nvidia is the superior option and the overwhelming majority of gamers recognize this to the point its over an order of magnitude out selling AMD.

You tried to cite Steve from Hardware Unboxed out of context because you’re stupid. What they found was you would have to pair a fairly powerful GPU with an incredibly underpowered CPU and then lower settings to a hilariously low configuration you would never ever run on said powerful GPU like 1080p low. They made it clear if you ran on a normally paired CPU or at normal settings you would never see this issue. Yeah, tell me more about how a RTX 4090 is being used to play games at 1080p low/med settings please. Meanwhile, as they pointed out in a real world configuration this driver overhead is virtually non-existent and the Nvidia GPUs actually don’t have this issue such as the RTX 3070 vs RX 6800 in their test.

Tell me you don’t know what the hell you are talking about without telling me directly.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1729463744a67b0e863dbf13863200ef48828d28df72de79972a4b41c5e047bd.jpg

What the hell does market share have anything to do with it? And damn you really are a special kind of stupid and lazy. Steve from hardware unboxed has covered this so go look it up you mental midget. And even in the initial techpowerup 4090 reviews using a 5800x, the 4090 can lose to slower cards at low-resolution due to the overhead and nvidia’s poor hardware scheduler. It is even worse if using an older slower outdated cpu for nvidia where as amd does not take that hit as much due to their software schedular.

9900K is pretty garbage at the high end these days,
I literally leave one on my floor so the box can half-cover my heater vent https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/910145ce0d93a69eba53b017565425be9c5f65a193eed1b469c9128d96b5be9c.jpg

“Nvidia can literally go backwards at lower resolutions in some case getting worse performance than at higher res.”

Dumb a*s confirmed. Literally making sh*t up. Great. Next post please.

Also evidence of actual benchmarks dispute your asinine conspiracy bullsh*t. Its why Nvidia absolutely dominates the market and AMD has a mere 8% marketshare vs Nvidia’s 88%, a f*king 11 fold difference.

A Fury X beats a GTX 1080 in Gears Of War 4 at 1080P with a FX 8350 CPU. It’s been known but nobody talked about it.

Hardware unboxed recently talked about it but nobody cares.

check your GPU usage mate, you are clearly bottlenecked
It’s such a shame you make all this effort for basically nothing

Thanks, weird, they did not post that info about the driver updates on the news site I was reading about this driver.